|
|
Caritas
- Papal Office
by
His Holiness Pope Pius XIII
January
20,
2005
Issue 048
THE MYSTICAL BODY - THE CHURCH
On June 29, 1943 Our predecessor of happy memory, Pope Pius XII, issued
the papal encyclical entitled (in Latin) MYSTICI CORPORIS which translated
into English means “The Mystical Body of Christ.” The source
is THE PAPAL ENCYCICALS IN THEIR HISTORICAL CONTEXT, edited by Anne Fremantle.
Pope Pius XII wrote this encyclical for many reasons. He wanted to condemn
many misconceptions concerning the very nature of the Church, misconceptions
which had surfaced and were making troubles not only for the world at large
but also for the Catholics themselves. We might say, that liberalism which
tends to deny all truth, is like a disease that can take over slowly. Men
no longer have the straight path of truth to guide them. They depart from
Christ Who said that He was the way, the truth and the life.
We quote Pope Pius XII in his Encyclical letter entitled “Mystici
Corporis, June 29, 1943. He says (quoting the above source from pp. 270
on):
“…We must confess that
grave errors with regard to this doctrine are being spread among those
outside the true Church,
and that
among the faithful, also, inaccurate or thoroughly false ideas are
being disseminated which turn minds aside from the straight path of truth.”
“For while there still survives
a false rationalism, which ridicules anything that transcends and defies
the power
of human genius, and which is accompanied by a cognate error, the so called
popular
rationalism, which sees and wills to see in the Church nothing
but a judicial and social union, there is on the other hand a false mysticism
creeping
in, which, in its attempt to eliminate the immovable frontier
that separates creatures from their Creator, falsifies the Sacred Scriptures.”
Pope Pius XII continues to set the records straight on the nature
of the Church:
“That the Church is a body is frequently asserted
in the Sacred Scriptures…. But it is not enough that the Body
of the Church should be an unbroken unity; it must also be something
definite and perceptible
to the senses as Our predecessor of happy memory, Leo XIII, in
his Encyclical Satis Congnitum asserts: ‘The Church is visible
because she is a body.’ Hence, they err in a matter of divine
truth, who imagine the Church to be invisible, intangible, a something ‘pneumatological’ as
they say, by which many Christian communities, though they
differ from each other in their profession of faith, are united
by an invisible
bond.”
When speaking of sins of those in the Church Pope Pius XII continues:
“For
not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its
own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism
or heresy or apostasy.
Men may lose charity and divine grace through sin, thus becoming
incapable of supernatural merit, and yet not be deprived of all life
if they hold
fast to faith and Christian hope, and if, illumined from
above, they are spurred on by interior promptings of the Holy Spirit
to salutary fear and
are moved to prayer and penance for their sins….”
Let us consider the aberrations of the present time:
In our day and age the very concept of Mystical Body is blurred because
of the tragedy of the bogus Council Vatican II (1962 – 1965). When
the Novus Ordo “pope,” John Paul II, and his Cardinals worship
with pagans in Catholic Churches, one knows that something is awry. Likewise,
when heads of Protestant Churches visit John Paul II he acts as if they
and he are all one religion. He is developing as fast as he can a one-world
religion where people of all religions are to feel as one and at home in
his religion.
We shall turn to the publication of the diehard Protestant writer (now
a deceased icon), Herbert W. Armstrong. We quote from
an undated (sample issue) of the Special Report entitled The
Philadelphia
Trumpet. The address
is Philadelphia Church of God, Post
Office Box 3700, Edmond, Oklahoma 73083. We believe that
some readers
may question
Our
editorial ethics by adding
or subtracting from the contents of that Protestant publication,
just in order to prove Our thesis that those Protestants see that the
Novus Ordo
religion under John Paul II is just exactly like they are.
We quote the most telling paragraph on page 21. We put it in bold print
exactly as it is.
“Again as reported in the February 1967 Plain Truth,
leading Protestant theologians began to seriously question any need for
a future Protestant movement. Lutheran Bishop of Berlin Otto Dibelius said, “If
the Catholic Church of 450 years ago had looked as it does today, there
never would have been a Reformation.” Dr. Carl E. Braaten of Chicago’s
Lutheran Theological Seminary concluded that it was becoming increasingly
difficult to justify “a need for Protestantism as an independent
movement.” Dr. Robert Brown of Stanford University, a Presbyterian,
said that “the Roman Catholic Reformation” was
now a fact, and Protestants cannot indefinitely justify
a situation of continued separation.”
Before We continue chopping away at the Novus Ordo Church We shall give
you a most telling quotation centered as it appears in the page that We
are quoting: Here it is as printed, in centered format:
The Pope, will step in as the
supreme unifying authority –
the
only one that can finally unite the differing nations of Europe….
Europe will go Roman Catholic!”
Over the years this leveling down into raw Protestantism of the
Novus Ordo Church went on the march immediately after the death of
Pope Pius
XII (October 9, 1958); and even to this day it continues
its rapid diabolical descent without a single pause.
The editors of PLAIN TRUTH keep on proving that the Portestantizing of
the Novus Ordo was spirited by every Novus Ordo “pope,” that
is, all those who seemed to sit in the Chair of Peter after the death of
Pope Pius XII.
The article continues with A Traveling Pope: …
“The pope made
an historic three day visit to Turkey in November 1979. There he held a
religious summit with Greek Orthodox Patriarch Demetrios I, stating a determination
to bring to a close what he has called the ‘intolerable scandal’ of
the divisions within the Christian-professing world.”
The article further states, concerning a visit to England:
“On his
second day there, the pope visited Canterbury Cathedral, headquarters of
the Church of England, which had rejected Rome four and a half centuries
earlier. Joining the pope was his host, Archbishop of Canterbury Robert
Rancie, and leaders of a dozen Orthodox and Protestant churches. The Archbishop,
in his opening remarks, vocalized the hope of a ‘celebration of a
common vision.’ Then followed what was another first for an Anglican
church – a SERMON BY A POPE.”
With the above information in mind it is not surprising to find that a
large number of Protestant Ministers are leaving their posts as Protestant
pastors and going over to the Novus Ordo Church of John Paul II. They see
no future in their dwindling sects, and they seek peace and consolation
in what they see as the one (over all) popular Christian religion where
many Protestants are now flocking.
The burden of statement by Protestant Ministers is that those convert
Ministers, together with their families, are in great need financial assistance.
Since the Novus Ordo Church of John Paul II is exactly as Protestant as
they are, there is no reason for them to continue to exist as independent
religions. Hence, they see themselves, independent of their various sects,
as one glorious Christian religion, and they for some reason see that John
Paul II has automatically become the head of the whole of their Christianity.
Since it is necessary for true Catholics to have a mature knowledge of
the Catholic Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, We quote again from the
Encyclical as follows (pp. 273-4):
“In a natural body the principle
of unity unites the parts in such a
manner that each lacks its own individual subsistence; on the contrary,
in the Mystical Body the mutual union, though
intrinsic, links the members by a bond
which
leaves to each the complete enjoyment of his won personality.
Moreover, if we examine the relations
existing between the several members
and the whole body, in every physical, living body, all the different
members are ultimately destined to the good
of the whole alone; while if we look
to its ultimate usefulness, every moral association of men is in the end
directed to the advancement of all
in general and of each single member
in particular;
for they are persons.”
And
thus – to return to Our theme – as
the Son of the Eternal Father came down
from heaven for the salvation of us all,
He likewise
established
the body of the Church and enriched it
with the divine Spirit to ensure that
immortal
souls should attain eternal happiness
according to the words
of the Apostle:
“All things are yours;
and you are Christ’s;
and Christ is God’s” For
the Church exists both for the
good of the faithful
and for the glory of God and of
Jesus Christ whom He sent.
“But if we compare a mystical
body with a moral body, it is to be noted that the difference between
them is not slight; rather it is very
considerable and very important.
In the moral body the principle of union is nothing else than the common
end, and the common cooperation of all
under the authority of Society for
the attainment of that end; whereas in the Mystical Body of which We
are speaking this collaboration is supplemented
by another internal principle, which
exists effectively in the whole and in each of its parts and whose excellence
is such that of itself it is
vastly superior to whatever bounds
of union may be found in a physical or moral body. As We said above,
this is something not of the natural but
of supernatural order; rather it
is something in itself infinite, uncreated; the Spirit of God, Who, as
the Angelic Doctor says, ‘numerically
one and the same, fills and unities the whole Church.’” [End
of quotations]
A person who is unbaptised enters the Church by receiving the valid sacrament
of baptism. An infant, of course, gets no preparation, but he is not to
be baptized unless there is good reason to believe he will be brought up
as a Catholic. However, an adult who has the use of reason must have certain
qualifications of faith. He must know and believe in God, the creator of
all things created. He must also believe that God rewards and punishes
in all justice: hell (includes the Limbo of the infants) for those dying
without sanctifying grace, and heaven for those dying in the sanctifying
grace.
The convert also must know and believe the Blessed Trinity with
three Divine Persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. He must also believe
the Incarnation,
that is, where the Second Person
of the Blessed Trinity became man, suffered and died for the salvation
of all men. As a climax Christ founded His Church
on St. Peter as the head of the Church
together with the other Apostles, and that Church always exists in
the true Catholic Church and only in the
true Catholic Church, on to the end
of the world. Finally, in order to be in obedience to God’s
command every human being must from birth until death live and die
in that Church. It is a dogma of faith that outside
the Church there is no salvation,
that is, rightly understood, outside the Church there is no possibility
of going to heaven.
At this juncture We shall give you a paragraph on justification
taken from the Council of Trent. The book with these decrees is still
available
at TAN Books. It is called Canons
and Decrees of the Council of Trent. We take this paragraph from
the Sixth Session, chapter four.
“A BRIEF
DESCRIPTION OF THE JUSTIFICATION
OF THE SINNER AND ITS MODE IN THE STATE OF GRACE in which words is given
a brief description of the justification
of the sinner, as being a translation
from the state in which man is born a child of the first Adam, to the state
of grace and of the adoption of
the sons of God through the
second Adam, Jesus Christ, our Savior. This translation however cannot,
since the promulgation of the Gospel, be effected
except through the laver of
regeneration or its desire, as it is written: Unless a man be born again
of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter
into the kingdom of God. (Col. 1:12-14)”
For those who do not know the obvious meaning of the above quotation We
shall add the following. All men lost sanctifying grace through the sin
of Adam, and without it no one can go to heaven. To go from that state
of ‘no sanctifying grace’ to the state of ‘sanctifying
grace’ one must receive the sacrament of baptism, called by the Council
of Trent, “the laver of regeneration.” There is one other aspect
to regeneration namely, “or its desire.” To explain this point
We go to the classical example where an Emperor who while he was on his
way to be baptized, was murdered, while he was still not baptized. The
doctrine expressed by a Father of the Church, (presuming the Emperor had
all the other qualifications – too long to repeat here) was: since
he desired the baptism of water in that circumstance he received the graces
of baptism. In other words by his desire for baptism (presuming also that
he had the act of perfect love) he had already received sanctifying grace,
and that is all he needed in order to enter heaven. There are some heretics
who, sad to say, deny this last part of the decree of the Council of Trent.
The classical response from Rome to the heretics mentioned above
and found in the book (yet available from TAN Books) is called The
Church Teaches. Jesuit Fathers of St. Mary’s
College, St. Mary’s Kansas
in 1955, produced it. We shall
give the paragraph numbers of
Our quotations.
266 We are bound to believe by divine and Catholic faith what is
contained in the written word
of God or in tradition, and is proposed by the Church as a divinely
revealed object of belief either in a solemn decree,
or in her ordinary, universal teaching (66).
267 The infallible
dictum which teaches us that outside the Church there is no salvation,
is among the truths that the Church has always taught
and will always teach.
268 This dogma is to be understood as the Church itself understands
it. For our Savior did not leave it to private judgment to explain what
is contained in the deposit of faith, but to the doctrinal authority of
the Church.
269 The Church teaches, first of all, that there is question here
of a very strict command of Jesus Christ. In unmistakable words he gave
his apostles the command to teach all nations to keep whatever he had commanded
(see Matt. 28:19).
270 Not least among Christ’s
commands is the one which orders us to be incorporated by baptism
into the mystical body of Christ, which is the Church, and
to be united to Christ and to his vicar, through whom
he himself governs the Church on earth in a visible way.
271 Therefore, no one who knows that the Church has been divinely established
by Christ and, nevertheless, refuses to be a subject of the
Church or refuses to obey the
Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth, will be saved.
272 The Savior did not make it necessary merely as by precept for
all nations to enter the Church. He also established the Church as a means
of salvation without which no one can enter the kingdom of heavenly glory.
273 Of those helps to salvation that are ordered to the last end
only by divine decree, not by intrinsic necessity, God, in his infinite
mercy, willed that such effect of those helps as are necessary to salvation
can, in certain circumstances, be obtained when the helps are used only
in desire or longing. We see this clearly stated in the Council of Trent
about the sacrament of regeneration and about the sacrament of penance
(see 560, 571).
274 The same, in due proportion, should be said of the Church insofar
as it is a general help to salvation. To gain eternal salvation it is not
always required that a person be incorporated in fact as a member of the
Church, but it is required that he belong to it at least in desire and
longing.
275 It is not always necessary that
this desire be explicit as it is with catechumens. When a man is invincibly
ignorant, God also
accepts
an implicit desire, so
called because it is contained in the good disposition of soul by which
a man wants his will to be conformed to God’s will.
276 This is clearly taught by the Sovereign Pontiff Pope Pius XII
in his dogmatic letter on the mystical body of Christ, dated June 29, 1943.
In this letter the Sovereign Pontiff clearly distinguishes between those
who are actually incorporated into the Church as members and those who
belong to the Church only in desire.
277 In treating of the members who
make up the mystical body here on earth, the Sovereign Pontiff
says: “Only those are really
to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized
and profess the
true faith, and who have
not had the misfortune to withdrawing from the body or for
grave faults
been cut off by legitimate authority.”
279 With these prudent words the pope censures those who exclude
from eternal salvation all men who belong to the Church only with implicit
desire; and he also censures those who falsely maintain that men can be
saved equally as well in any religion (see 173ff.; 178).
It should be clear to concerned individuals that We provide you with as
many sources of the truth, that are available to Us, in a document of this
size.
As a practical point, the Church is referred to by Christ as a sheepfold
where, of course, there is
a shepherd and sheep. To be in the Church, the shepherd (the Pope)
must know his sheep (the faithful), and the sheep must
know their shepherd. Just
feeling well towards the Pope and living a morally good life does
not make one a Catholic. The people who saw Noe build the
ark but did not enter it,
every single one was lost in the great deluge. Keep in mind the qualifications
given above concerning invincible ignorance
and implicit desire. Those
who are given the truth, as found explained again in this letter,
very likely will not be able to plead invincible
ignorance and implicit desire
before the just and final judgment seat of God.
Pius, pp. XIII
January 20, 2005
|