August 19, 1989
by Fr. Lucian Pulvermacher, OFM Cap.
Vatican II Council - Accepts Freedom
This letter by a true Catholic priest provides
proof that the Novus Ordo is not the true Catholic Church. It shows the
errors promulgated by the Vatican II council, by comparing those teachings
with Catholic Church teachings prior to Vatican II. The priest also tells
us about his true Catholic faith, and he teaches us what we must believe
and do in order to be saved.
You will be scandalized in me
Just recently my conscience began to tell me that my life could be a scandal
to some of you. Our Lord Jesus Christ told His Apostles that they would
be scandalized in Him. Later when seeing Him hanging on the cross they
would be tempted to disbelieve in Him. Our Lord had to die on the Cross
(fulfilling the will of His Father in heaven) in order to redeem all mankind.
Hence, there was no option on His part. He had to give that scandal. There
was no fault on His part. That is, however, all together different when
one does evil. That scandal must be avoided. There are even times when
one is doing nothing wrong, and still he is giving scandal. For example,
when an old couple have an adulterous marriage, and they are living together
as brother and sister. Once that fact of the adulterous marriage is known,
the fact must be made known that they are living together as brother and
sister. Then the scandal is removed.
I am concerned about people not knowing that what I am doing is good, and
it looks as if I am doing something evil. It looks as if I am a renegade,
a man who had abandoned his faith. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
I am keeping my faith, and I am living it to the best of my ability. It
will not come as a surprise to most of you that the Vatican II Church,
and those who belong to it, have to give up that faith. Let me get behind
a private revelation that has the approval of Pope Pius IX and Pope Leo
XIII. At LaSalette, France, on Sept. 19, 1846, among other things Our Lady
revealed (in a private revelation) namely, that Rome will lose the Faith
and become the seat of the anti-Christ. I must return to Popes Pius
IX and Leo XIII. If what was revealed at LaSalette were against public
revelation, those two Popes could not have given it their approval. I hold
that we are living in the time when Rome has lost the faith and
become the seat of the anti-Christ. Please bear with me as I prove
Rome - The Seat of the anti-Christ
When quoting Council Vatican II (a robber council), I am using the book
directly from that council, "The Documents of Vatican II"
by Walter Abbot, Guild Press, New York, with the Imprimatur of Lawrence
Cardinal Shehan, Archbishop of Baltimore, dated Feb. 14, 1966. For those
who still have that faith, my quotations from the above documents will
shock you no end. Furthermore, it should vindicate my stand.
What Vatican II Documents Say
On page 692 No. 12, we read:
"The Church therefore is being faithful to the
truth of the gospel, and is following the way of Christ and the apostles
when she recognizes, and gives support to, the principle of religious
freedom as befitting the dignity of man and as being in accord with
On page 679, No. 2, we read:
"The Synod (of Vatican II) further declares that
the right to religious freedom has its foundation in the very dignity
of the human person, as this dignity is known through the revealed Word
of God and by reason itself. This right of the human person to religious
freedom is to be recognized in the constitutional law whereby society is
governed. Thus it is to become a civil right. …… Therefore, the right
to religious freedom has its foundation, not in the subjective disposition
of the person, but in his very nature. In consequence, the right to this
immunity continues to exist even in those who do not live up to their obligation
of seeking the truth and adhering to it. Nor is the exercise of this right
to be impeded, provided that the just requirements of public order are
Finally, Paul VI and the duped Council Fathers concluded this hideous document
on religious freedom with the following confirmation. I can hardly
believe my eyes. Here it is:
"Each and every one of the things set forth in
this Declaration has won the consent of the Fathers of this most sacred
Council (Vatican II). We, too, (referring to the papal "We") by the apostolic
authority conferred on us by Christ, join with the Venerable Fathers in
approving, decreeing, and establishing these things in the Holy Spirit,
and we direct that what has thus been enacted in synod be published to
God's glory. - Rome, at St. Peter's, Dec. 7, 1965 - I, Paul, Bishop of
the Catholic Church."
The above teachings of Vatican II have been condemned by the Church over
and over. Actually, the above teaching is equivalent to saying that one
religion is just as good as another. That also admits that no religion
is perfectly correct. I shall quote the true teachings from the book, "The
Sources of Catholic Dogma", Denzinger, B. Herder Book Co., with the
Imprimatur of Bishop Patrick A. O'Boyle, April 25, 1955. This book has
the words from Pope Pius IX's Encyclical, Quanta Cura, Dec. 8, 1864.
We quote from paragraph 1689:
Traditional Catholic Teachings
"And also, contrary to the teaching of Sacred
Scripture, of the Church, of the most holy Fathers, they do not hesitate
to assert "that the best condition of society is the one in which there
is no acknowledgment by government of the duty of restraining, by established
penalties, offenders of the Catholic religion, except insofar as the public
peace demands …… And, from this false idea of social organization they
do not fear to foster that erroneous opinion, especially fatal to the Catholic
Church and to the salvation of souls, called, by Our predecessor of recent
memory, Gregory XVI, insanity; namely, that "liberty of conscience and
of worship is the law in every correctly established society; that the
right to all manner of liberty rests in the citizens, not to be restrained
by either ecclesiastical or civil authority; and that by this right they
can manifest openly and publicly and declare their own concepts, whatever
they may be, by voice, by print, or in any other way." While, in truth,
they rashly affirm this, they do not understand and note they are preaching
a "liberty of perdition," and that "if human opinions always have freedom
for discussion, there could never be wanting those who will dare to resist
truth, and to trust in the eloquence of human (al. mundane) wisdom, when
faith and Christian wisdom know from the very teaching of our Lord Jesus
Christ how much it should avoid such harmful vanity."
Over and over we are told that Vatican II was not a dogmatic council. An
overview of some of the above quotations convinces me that it was a dogmatic
council. I shall highlight the very telling words of Vatican II. In number
"The Church … is following the way of Christ
and the apostles … (and is) … in accord with divine revelation."
Then we go to the final words of the document of Vatican II. Paul VI and
the Council Fathers try to make a dogmatic decree by the words, again following
Christ (so they say):
" … approving decreeing, and establishing
these things in the Holy Spirit, and we direct that what has thus been
enacted in the synod be published to God's glory."
Just looking at the words, we see that Vatican II attempted to make a dogma
of the faith contrary to all former dogmatic decrees. What audacity!
It is against right reason to agree that the Church's former dogmatic teaching
on religious freedom and that of Council Vatican II is the same
teaching. One teaching has to be wrong, and that is the teaching of Council
Vatican II. My faith and reason tell me (and it should tell you too) that
I must stay with the constant tradition of the Church. The last Catholic
on earth will believe as the first Catholics, or he is not a Catholic.
The Teachings ARE Different
Some people tell me that I am not in the Church because I am not subject
to the (heretical) pope. Truly, I am in no way subject to the so-called
holders of the Chair of Peter since the death of Pope Pius XII on the 9th
of October 1958. I am still living in the reign of Pope Pius XII. I say
Mass, administer the Sacraments, observe the calendar and the like, as
it was when Pope Pius XII died.
We Are Subject to Pope Pius XII
At this time I could go through all the arguments that made John XXIII,
Paul VI, and John Paul I non-popes. However, the question before us is
John Paul II. "Father Lucian, you must be subject to John Paul II in order
to be in the Church." Wrong! John Paul II is not the Pope. By teaching
everything in Council Vatican II he is a heretic. My faith will be gone
as soon as I admit that Vatican II taught the truth, namely that all religions
are the same. When Vatican II declared that all religions have a civil
right to exist, that makes all of them to be the same. That is obvious
The Holy Scriptures tell me what I must do with a heretic. St. Paul tells
Titus (3,10-11): "A man that is a heretic … avoid." Though he were himself
an Apostle or an angel from Heaven, "let him be anathema." The heretic
before us is John Paul II, and I must call him anathema.
A Heretic Cannot Be Pope
For you who have not studied theology, the above argument should be
sufficient to break with John Paul II, for he is not the Pope of the Catholic
Church. He is the "pope" of sect Vatican II. His followers are automatically
in that sect, and on religious grounds I can have no part with you or your
Since this article will be read also by priests, I must bring up a point
of Canon Law. Of course, the only law I recognize is the 1918 Code of Canon
Law. The new code is a product of your Vatican II sect. That code is heretical
too, in that it makes the Vatican II bishops of the world equal
with the Vatican II pope. I have a complete study of that sordid problem.
Priests and Canon Law
We shall make a short study of Canon 188 #4. It reads (in Latin):
"Ob tacitam renuntiationem ab ipso admissam quaelibet
officia vacant ipso facto et sine ulla declaratione, si clericus: #4 A
fide catholica publice defecerit."
The English translation is:
"Through tacit resignation, accepted by the law
itself, all offices become vacant ipso facto and without any declaration
if a cleric: #4 Has publicly forsaken the Catholic Faith."
From all the above arguments it should be clear to all of you that John
Paul II (certainly a cleric) has publicly forsaken the Catholic Faith.
The one and only conclusion (again) is that he is not the Pope of the Catholic
Church. With John Paul II out of office, all his bishops, priests and laity
are in heresy and schism. In no way can I have any part with the Vatican
II church. The sting of Canon 188 #4 is that it takes place without any
declaration. This is a qualifying Canon not a penal one. No council or
judge is needed. All one needs is a clear mind and the Catholic faith to
see what I am writing about.
The question surfaces: How can you be in the Catholic Church without being
subject to the Pope? As I said before, I am subject to Pope Pius XII. The
marks of a Catholic are three. One must be baptized with the baptism of
water. He must believe all that God teaches through His Church, and finally
he must be subject to the Pope. If I eat meat on any Friday of the year,
I sin because that is the rule in the continuous reign of Pope Pius XII.
Once we have a true Pope, successor of St. Peter and Vicar of Christ living
on earth, I must be subject to his laws. I live without a superior, and
I am not a superior to anyone. While there is no living Pope, I do not
see how we can have jurisdiction in the external form. From my studies,
too long for this letter, I conclude that I have jurisdiction in the internal
form. That is why I can hear confession.
The Marks of a True Catholic
I feel sure that all of you know the dogma that states a hard truth
of our faith: "Outside the Church there is no salvation." Knowing
that the Vatican II church is not the Catholic Church, I cannot enter it
without leaving the Church outside of which there is No Salvation.
Some people accuse me of being unable to accept changes. That is both true
and untrue. In matters of faith I may never accept a change. Obviously,
if I did so I would become a heretic. When there are changes in the Church
that do not involve the doctrines of the faith I can and must accept them.
If the true Pope makes more or less fast days, I must accept them. A Pope
has an obligation and a right, of course, to direct all the faithful to
their everlasting destiny, namely, heaven.
Can the Catholic Church Change?
I have no doubt that some of you have questions that I have not answered.
No article of this size could possibly answer all your questions. I am
ready to answer all honest questions. The Pharisees asked questions to
torture Christ; not so the Apostles. Our social relations remain the same
as in the past. Now you know my faith, and the problem it, of necessity,
must create. Through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary and all
the Saints, I pray to God that all of us may be one in the True Faith
on earth so that we may be one in glory in heaven forever. Amen.